|
Post by david on Dec 31, 2021 18:18:35 GMT 1
There was an article in the Times yesterday about privilege.
I made a comment and it was rejected. Their system said to re-phrase the comment. So I did.
It was rejected a second time. All I said was that “if we are all privileged and equal then who would do the work. Life is learning, working and marrying. This is what homo sapiens do”. (or words to that effect)
I put another comment a few months ago and that was rejected. I wonder what sort of algorithm the Times has. I now believe that if you are once rejected their algorithm will always look out for you. Now if I had mentioned Trump, Brexit, the Tories, JK Rowling or China nothing would have happened.
Everything on the Times comments has to be blasé and pretty basic. I am now cancelling my subscription.
|
|
suein56
Member
Southern Morbihan 56 Brittany
Posts: 7,508
|
Post by suein56 on Dec 31, 2021 18:21:18 GMT 1
Do you think maybe your choice of the word 'marrying' might have been the problem ?
|
|
|
Post by woolybanana on Dec 31, 2021 19:06:09 GMT 1
Try ‘pairing’ and ditch the ‘homo sapiens’ as it is too exclusive in this distorted world full of the grotesque.
|
|
|
Post by pcpa on Dec 31, 2021 20:28:45 GMT 1
It would be the word Homo, try Homogenous Sapiens
|
|
|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 31, 2021 22:59:30 GMT 1
I reckon it's the missing question mark wot done it.
|
|