|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 2, 2022 15:50:53 GMT 1
How would a charity employee be paid "tax free"? It must be true. It was from an unattributed social media post.
|
|
|
Post by omegal on Dec 2, 2022 16:25:03 GMT 1
How would a charity employee be paid "tax free"? It must be true. It was from an social media post. Put your glasses on, the name on the post was from a John Taggart and are we not all unattributed on Forums. He has at least written something that you are free to challenge but it appears you prefer not to?
|
|
|
Post by omegal on Dec 2, 2022 16:36:22 GMT 1
On another Forum people are asking questions as to the truth of the post, now it is out there I guess the snooping journos will, or will not find something?
|
|
|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 2, 2022 16:45:36 GMT 1
It must be true. It was from an social media post. Put your glasses on, the name on the post was from a John Taggart and are we not all unattributed on Forums. He has at least written something that you are free to challenge but it appears you prefer not to? THE John Taggart. The one that runs the poultry farm near Dunfermline?
|
|
|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 2, 2022 16:55:34 GMT 1
Put your glasses on, the name on the post was from a John Taggart and are we not all unattributed on Forums. He has at least written something that you are free to challenge but it appears you prefer not to? THE John Taggart. The one that runs the poultry farm near Dunfermline? Nobody in their right mind is going to comment on a post that is supposedly written by someone they've never heard of. I know you are desperate to smear the subject of this thread but quoting bollocks off the Internet is preposterous
|
|
|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 2, 2022 17:00:12 GMT 1
Disappearing down the rabbit hole of searching the Web for arguments to support certain polemics only demonstrates how easily nonsense spreads. "It must be true, it was on Facebook"
Getting even further down by responding to unattributable "quotes" is pure madness.
And just putting a random name doesn't equal attribution.
|
|
tim17
Member
Posts: 959
Member is Online
|
Post by tim17 on Dec 2, 2022 17:43:32 GMT 1
There is enough public information out there about the founder of Sistah Space for people to make their own mind up whether she has an 'agenda' or not.
Is that really relevant though 'if' the conversation as reported is correct?
|
|
|
Post by omegal on Dec 2, 2022 17:52:55 GMT 1
THE John Taggart. The one that runs the poultry farm near Dunfermline? Nobody in their right mind is going to comment on a post that is supposedly written by someone they've never heard of. I know you are desperate to smear the subject of this thread but quoting bollocks off the Internet is preposterous Well that is rather nasty, I said I was the messenger, so I suggest you go out there and find the person that may, or may not have written it. What nonsense to say " I know you are desperate to smear the subject of this thread but quoting bollocks off the Internet is preposterous" The preposterous person is you in accusing me of simply putting something that is out there on social media, I have no intention of anything other than what I posted and if you pathetically want to accuse me of being desperate to to smear the subject, then can I tell you to put more water with it because you are talking utter sh*te.
|
|
|
Post by omegal on Dec 2, 2022 17:56:36 GMT 1
Disappearing down the rabbit hole of searching the Web for arguments to support certain polemics only demonstrates how easily nonsense spreads. "It must be true, it was on Facebook" Getting even further down by responding to unattributable "quotes" is pure madness. And just putting a random name doesn't equal attribution. Funnily enough, anything you say is non attributable, you are ForumUser2 which of course means absolutely nothing. You yourself have a random name, like most of us, best we don't post then if that is standard you wish to use.
|
|
|
Post by gigi on Dec 2, 2022 18:37:33 GMT 1
I thought that the woman who felt she’d been racially abused had a pretty good memory, but I’ve been told that she recorded the conversation. Odd to use a recording device at what must have been a rather noisy gathering.
|
|
|
Post by pcpa on Dec 2, 2022 18:48:53 GMT 1
How would a charity employee be paid "tax free"? It must be true. It was from an unattributed social media post. I didn't say it was true or ask if it was true, I asked how does that happen? ie what mecahnism can I, sorry my friend use to take money from their charity tax free, it seems a reasonable question.
And of course if the answer is that it cannot happen then it draws into question the possible agenda of the person who wrote it, just as do the utterings of the self appointed victim.
|
|
|
Post by cernunnos on Dec 2, 2022 18:53:52 GMT 1
I think the black lady has "shot herself in the foot" , as the saying goes . There is much ado about nothing , but she won't get an invite again!
|
|
|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 2, 2022 19:10:41 GMT 1
Disappearing down the rabbit hole of searching the Web for arguments to support certain polemics only demonstrates how easily nonsense spreads. "It must be true, it was on Facebook" Getting even further down by responding to unattributable "quotes" is pure madness. And just putting a random name doesn't equal attribution. Funnily enough, anything you say is non attributable, you are ForumUser2 which of course means absolutely nothing. You yourself have a random name, like most of us, best we don't post then if that is standard you wish to use. Ignore me. It isn't hard
|
|
|
Post by ForumUser2 on Dec 2, 2022 19:11:42 GMT 1
Well that is rather nasty, I said I was the messenger, so I suggest you go out there and find the person that may, or may not have written it. What nonsense to say " I know you are desperate to smear the subject of this thread but quoting bollocks off the Internet is preposterous" The preposterous person is you in accusing me of simply putting something that is out there on social media, I have no intention of anything other than what I posted and if you pathetically want to accuse me of being desperate to to smear the subject, then can I tell you to put more water with it because you are talking utter sh*te. I seem to have offended you. Ah, well...
|
|
|
Post by glazedallover on Dec 2, 2022 19:59:04 GMT 1
Disappearing down the rabbit hole of searching the Web for arguments to support certain polemics only demonstrates how easily nonsense spreads. "It must be true, it was on Facebook" Getting even further down by responding to unattributable "quotes" is pure madness. And just putting a random name doesn't equal attribution. Funnily enough, anything you say is non attributable, you are ForumUser2 which of course means absolutely nothing. You yourself have a random name, like most of us, best we don't post then if that is standard you wish to use. I suspect that FU2's forum name is anything but random, and has been very carefully selected.......
|
|