|
Post by woolybanana on Aug 5, 2021 18:33:25 GMT 1
Shallow, self-serving, attention seeking.
|
|
spectre
Member
Mougins 06
Posts: 17
|
Post by spectre on Aug 5, 2021 18:54:31 GMT 1
Shallow, self-serving, attention seeking. Enough about you, how about her?
|
|
|
Post by woolybanana on Aug 5, 2021 19:01:15 GMT 1
Oh you wicked tease you!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 19:11:42 GMT 1
Shallow, self-serving, attention seeking. It would be interesting to learn how you formed that opinion of her. Have you spent time in her company perhaps?
|
|
|
Post by woolybanana on Aug 5, 2021 19:31:02 GMT 1
Ally, my dear old son, you set this one up but I am not biting. You know perfectly what I was talking about.
|
|
suein56
Member
Southern Morbihan 56 Brittany
Posts: 7,520
|
Post by suein56 on Aug 5, 2021 20:15:14 GMT 1
Shallow, self-serving, attention seeking. For once Woolly one I agree with you .. but did not have the bravura to announce it. Oops .. I just did; never mind. Can't stand the woman ..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 20:21:18 GMT 1
Its such a shame that she has somehow lost contact with a good proportion of her family.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 20:27:19 GMT 1
Ally, my dear old son, you set this one up but I am not biting. You know perfectly what I was talking about. Somebody needs to know what you're talking about. If only it were you!
|
|
|
Post by bubbles1 on Aug 5, 2021 20:39:11 GMT 1
Oh come on everyone - they said they left the UK because they were being "hounded" and Harry didnt want that to happen for his family as it did for his mother - fine good luck to you. Not a problem.
Then all we hear is H&M appearing on this programme and that programme , giving interviews, writing books about his life - so much for not wanting publicity and privacy - total tosh - they went there to make money as they couldnt do it in the UK. . As for her being a TV star, she may have been in the USA but I dont know of anyone I know or have spoken to who had even heard of "Suits" let alone her. Me I think she is a brilliant actress - watch you back Harry! I personally am sick to bloody death of hearing about them, who cares how old she is, who cares anything. They have been more in the public eye since they left the UK than they ever were when they were there. - What a surprise - maybe that is what she couldnt swallow
As for the comments on the Duchess of york - she tried to make a living (and did so) and yes used her status and friends - but she never left the UK because she said it was about her privacy.
just my opinion. Im fed up hearing about them. I just wish they would fade into the background of the USA.
|
|
ibis
Banned Member
Posts: 1,376
|
Post by ibis on Aug 5, 2021 20:42:08 GMT 1
Just look at poor Britney Spears... Nobody but the involved know the complete picture but I can support her; nobody should be put thru that unless she is certifiable or being used by her family. #FreeBritney
The little I saw of Suits, Megan was not very good and not even the star or close to it.(e) just a good looking girl(/e) Cannot remember if her character was a b**ch, mistress or good girl but she is doing what she wants to do and with a better return USD wise than anyone here could make in 20 or more life times.
You have no obligation to watch, listen or read about her.
|
|
|
Post by lindalovely on Aug 5, 2021 21:12:23 GMT 1
I think the Duchess of York left to escape the British press and the complicated family situation if I remember correctly...not that I blame her..her ex husband was off cavorting with under age girls without any comment and she was being filmed on the beach with her boyfriend and criticised.
What I still don't understand about everyone's anger is why you all care. I have no idea whether either of them are nice or interesting people. I wouldn't go out of my way to meet them..I have never watched any of their interviews or read their outpourings and I have never watched Suits..but I neither would I criticise either of them for making a living.
The irony is when the monarchy falls they'll be the ones that will be okay, being far away and independent.
They would fade into the background in the USA if people just left them alone.. that's the irony. It isn't people like me that keep them in the limelight but all those keen to criticise them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 21:25:09 GMT 1
Ally, my dear old son, you set this one up but I am not biting. You know perfectly what I was talking about. I'm genuinely intrigued. I'll concede attention seeking but that goes with the showbiz territory. Shop window and all that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 21:36:22 GMT 1
They are kept in the limelight by the likes of the daily Mail - its a show-biz thing like love island etc.
Its the Alf Garnetts of the UK that keep the royals going, especially when there is a bit of gossip.
|
|
exile
Member
Massif Central
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by exile on Aug 5, 2021 21:49:11 GMT 1
Interesting how many people say they've gone away to live their lives independent of the Royal family in UK so let them get on with it. It is very noticeable that they are using the "royal" connection to raise pots of cash in a country that fantasizes about royal traditions. Hypocrisy springs to mind. Why hypocrisy? They are who they are. Nothing can change their past. And if a host of fawning sh1tw1t media companies are prepared to pay them a stack of $s so that they can publicise issues that are important to them such as mental health and women's opportunities towards equality, do you think it is really wrong of them to grasp those opportunities? Or perhaps to return to Ally's well made point, perhaps you think Diana was only on it for the glory and did not give a damn about land mines, the disadvantaged, orphaned children etc..
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 5, 2021 22:03:36 GMT 1
Without any connection to royalty do you think that Diana would have given a second glance to Charles?
|
|